blurring, sharpening, light intensity.) - very neat for touching up renders The one big feature that Krita has that GIMP doesn't that makes it an instant win and something I'd readily recommend is that it supports filters masks (a.k.a adjustment layers in Photoshop lingo) for non-destructive editing. It's super easy to pick up, whereas The GIMP might be a little unintuitive for Photoshoppers. For the tools that arch guys need, from my brief foray I just wanted to share that I think it is more than capable and we should definitely be advertising it as an Adobe Photoshop alternative. Krita started after the GIMP, and I tried it a little when it first started but my goodness now it's much more mature and gives off quite a polish that The GIMP just doesn't convey (well, to me, personally, at least). One tool that I never played with was Krita. I'm very familiar with the Adobe suite, and also with The GIMP. I've done a lot of arch viz, both the 3D kind and the 2D image-collage kind. I recently checked out Krita after reading about their latest beta release: TL DR go and recommend Krita to those using Photoshop! If they've tried The GIMP and turned back, this may surprise them! This should be one of the links on the wiki for beginning their free software journey, as it's a nice easy win.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |